Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology ; 78(Supplement 111):311, 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2296998

ABSTRACT

Background: The unprecedented prevalence of olfactory disfunction (OD) by SARS-CoV- 2 has revealed the lack of specialized units dealing with sense of smell. The main objective of the study is to know the number of newly created olfactory units (OU) since the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to evaluate the diagnosis, management and treatment of patients with OD. Method(s): Prospective cross-sectional study. Carried out by means of a survey with 20 items: having or not having an OU, demographic data, smell test, evolution and management of OD, data on treatments. The variables of the survey were approved by the rhinology commission of the Spanish society of ENT. The digital survey was distributed to all members of Spanish ENT and Allergy Societies. Result(s): A total of 16 responses were missing data, and further 12 responses were duplicated. Finally, 136 surveys were included. From them 82.4% answers were from otolaryngologists and 17.7% from allergists. The cohort of allergists and otolaryngologists was compared to ensure comparability of both samples. There were significant differences in the instrumental assessment of the olfaction, VAS and smell test (p = 0.016) was more common in otolaryngologists. Also, the prescription of olfactory rehabilitation (OR) (p < 0.001) was more common in otolaryngologists. The 40.5% (+/- 7.6) of all the existent OU were created after COVID-19 pandemics. The 33.9% (+/- 4.5) of the respondent have an OU now, while 22.3% (+/- 3.9) already had it before COVID-19 pandemics. It means that 17% of hospitals who did not have an OU before COVID-19, now they have it, while 82.8% are still lacking it. OR was prescribed for 1-3 months by 38%;3-6 months by 48.1% and > 6 months by 13.9%. Those with an OU prescribe OR during more time (p = 0.002) being the most frequent answer 3-6 months (69.4%) when they have OU while 1-3 months (52.4%) for those who do not have it. Conclusion(s): This study revealed that COVID-19 pandemic has stimulated the creation of OU and has demonstrated the utility of OU to deal with patients with OD, as their daily practice is more adapted to up-to- date clinical evidence between allergist and otolaryngologists.

3.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 32(4): 291-298, 2022 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1964860

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Most smell tests are difficult to implement in daily clinical practice owing to their long duration. The aim of the present study was to develop and validate a short, easy-to-perform, and reusable smell test to be implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The study population comprised 120 healthy adults and 195 patients with self-reported olfactory dysfunction (OD). The 8-Odorant Barcelona Olfactory Test (BOT-8) was used for detection, memory/recognition, and forced-choice identification. In addition, a rose threshold test was performed, and a visual analog scale was applied. The Smell Diskettes Olfaction Test (SDOT) was used for correlation in healthy volunteers, and the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) was used for patients with OD to establish cut-offs for anosmia and hyposmia. In order to take account of the COVID-19 pandemic, disposable cotton swabs with odorants were compared with the original test. RESULTS: In healthy persons, the mean (SD) BOT-8 score was 100% for detection, 94.5% (1.07) for memory/recognition, and 89.6% (0.86) for identification. In patients with OD, the equivalent values were 86% (32.8), 73.2% (37.9), and 77.1% (34.2), respectively. BOT-8 demonstrated good test-retest reliability, with agreement of 96.7% and a quadratic k of 0.84 (P<.001). A strong correlation was observed between BOT-8 and SDOT (r=0.67, P<.001) and UPSIT (r=0.86, P<.001). Agreement was excellent for disposable cotton swabs, with a k of 0.79 compared with the original test. The cut-off point for anosmia was ≤3 (area under the curve, 0.83; sensitivity, 0.673; specificity, 0.993). CONCLUSION: BOT-8 offers an efficient and fast method for assessment of smell threshold, detection, memory, and identification in daily clinical practice. Disposable cotton swabs with odorants proved to be useful and safe during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Olfaction Disorders , Adult , Anosmia , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Odorants , Olfaction Disorders/diagnosis , Olfaction Disorders/epidemiology , Pandemics , Reproducibility of Results , Smell
4.
5.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 31(1): 17-35, 2021 Feb 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1102728

ABSTRACT

Airway examination procedures can potentially transmit infectious diseases to patients and to the health care professionals who perform them via various mechanisms. The COVID-19 pandemic has halted most of the activity of the clinics and laboratories involved in assessment of lung and nasal function, and clear recommendations in this regard have been made. Today, we still do not know for sure what its consequences will be in the short or long term, since important gaps remain in our knowledge of aspects as fundamental as virus transmission mechanisms, pathophysiology, immune response, and diagnosis. In this review, we study the examination techniques used to assess patients with respiratory allergy, asthma, and associated diseases during this period and highlight their possible advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, we focus on exploring the entire upper and lower airways, from the perspective of the safety of both health professionals and patients and their specific characteristics. We also analyze the intrinsic value of these interventions in terms of diagnosis and patient management. The changing situation of COVID-19 may mean that some of the assertions presented in this review will have to be modified in the future. While we seek to ensure a consistently broad approach, some differences in operational details may apply owing to local regulations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Occupational Health , Patient Safety , Respiratory Hypersensitivity/physiopathology , Respiratory System/physiopathology , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/transmission , Health Personnel , Humans , Mass Screening , Respiratory Function Tests , Ventilation
6.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 30(5): 346-357, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1000713

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Since the initial anecdotal reports of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from China, a growing number of studies have reported on smell and/or taste dysfunction (STD). Objective: The aim of our study was to investigate the frequency and severity of STD in COVID-19 patients and to evaluate the association with demographic characteristics, hospital admission, symptoms, comorbidities, and blood biomarkers. METHODS: We performed a multicenter cross-sectional study on patients who were positive for SARS-CoV-2 (n=846) and controls (n=143) from 15 Spanish hospitals. Data on STD were collected prospectively using an in-person survey. The severity of STD was categorized using a visual analog scale. We analyzed time to onset, recovery rate, time to recovery, hospital admission, pneumonia, comorbidities, smoking, and symptoms. RESULTS: STD was at least 2-fold more common in COVID-19-positive patients than in controls. COVID-19-positive hospitalized patients were older, with a lower frequency of STD, and recovered earlier than outpatients. Analysis stratified by severity of STD showed that more than half of COVID-19 patients presented severe loss of smell (53.7%) or taste (52.2%); both senses were impaired in >90%. In the multivariate analysis, older age (>60 years), being hospitalized, and increased C-reactive protein were associated with a better sense of smell and/or taste. COVID-19-positive patients reported improvement in smell (45.6%) and taste (46.1%) at the time of the survey; in 90.6% this was within 2 weeks of infection. CONCLUSION: STD is a common symptom in COVID-19 and presents mainly in young and nonhospitalized patients. More studies are needed to evaluate follow-up of chemosensory impairment.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Olfaction Disorders/epidemiology , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Taste Disorders/epidemiology , Taste Disorders/etiology , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Betacoronavirus/genetics , Betacoronavirus/immunology , COVID-19 , Case-Control Studies , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Olfaction Disorders/diagnosis , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Public Health Surveillance , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Spain/epidemiology , Symptom Assessment , Taste Disorders/diagnosis , Young Adult
7.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 30(5): 317-326, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-260587

ABSTRACT

The first cases of coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) occurred in Wuhan, China, and the disease rapidly become a public health emergency of international proportions. COVID-19 can cause mild-to-severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and is caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. The clinical manifestations of COVID-19 include fever, dry cough, fatigue, sputum production, shortness of breath, sore throat, and headache. We performed this narrative review to analyze the current literature on postviral olfactory dysfunction related to the SARSCoV- 2 pandemic. Since the initial anecdotal reports from China, increasingly frequent international reports on COVID-19 indicate that 5% to 85% of affected patients lose their sense of smell, thus highlighting the very heterogeneous nature of the literature in this area. Therefore, we advise home isolation measures and/or social distancing, as well as tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 when possible, in patients with sudden and severe loss of smell who cannot be promptly evaluated.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/physiology , Coronavirus Infections/complications , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Disease Outbreaks , Olfaction Disorders/epidemiology , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Olfaction Disorders/diagnosis , Olfaction Disorders/therapy , Olfactory Bulb/anatomy & histology , Olfactory Bulb/physiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Smell
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL